"Naming names of diplomats who have issued candid assessments of sensitive foreign affairs and foreign leaders, under the expectation of confidentiality, will destroy or diminish the trust and credibility of our envoys, and work against candid communication and sound policymaking.
"Disclosing information about the endeavors of human rights activists and political dissidents in authoritarian regimes -- not the United States of Julian Assange's fantasy, but real jackboot places like China and Burma -- will put them and their work at risk. In the end, there is likely to be less transparency, not more...."
The only question remaining is: Of what use is it to gain another Pulitzer Prize, if you lose your soul?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5b58/e5b5884864bd35947c3652d572724c4d73c7d4f4" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment